Construction as biological cells: An exploratory study

Abeysekera, V and Shelke, M (2018) Construction as biological cells: An exploratory study. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(4), pp. 276-292. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Perfection in nature is inspiring. The near-flawless proliferation of biological cells to construct a functional structure based on an embedded design is impressive. Accordingly, biological cell theory is explored using simile and metaphor to draw further inspiration for developing new insights. It is shown through examples that cells similar to biological cells can indeed be identified in construction including embedded designs. Biological cell properties are reviewed, and three properties, namely embedded design, rate of cell proliferation, and biological cell control mechanism are explored synthesizing new insights for managing construction. A new model symbolized as Readiness–Growth–Rest (RGR) consisting of three main states has also been proposed for cell-based construction driven by the embedded design. It consists of a readiness gate to ensure the embedded design is flawless and its readiness to enter the Growth state with transient growth checks and a completion gate. Any cell abnormality during the Growth state including any instability in the rate of cell proliferation diverts the cell into a Transient Rest state for appropriate action before it is permitted to re-enter the Growth state. The suitability, acceptability, and feasibility of the RGR model needs to be ascertained further for cell-based construction to be a greater reality.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biomimicry; construction cell; metaphor; production management; readiness; simile
Index terms: production management, exploratory study, suitability, biomimetic
Subjects: project delivery, design theory, design criteria, research methods
Topics: Design Practice, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here