Modeling of LOB scheduling with learning development effect

Ammar, M A and Abdel-Maged, A F (2018) Modeling of LOB scheduling with learning development effect. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(6), pp. 517-526. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Several techniques have been used to schedule repetitive projects; the most widely one is Line-Of-Balance (LOB). The primary advantage of LOB is maintaining work continuity, which leads to maximizing learning development effect and minimizing idle time of crews. While LOB is basically applicable to repetitive projects, learning development effect that naturally inherent with repetition is usually ignored. Several mathematical models, or learning curves, have been developed to investigate variation in productivity as a function of the number of units produced. The most practical and used one is the straight-line model. In this paper, learning development effect is incorporated into traditional LOB scheduling. The basic equation of LOB technique has been modified to consider learning development effect, in which straight-line learning curve model is adopted. An example project is used to demonstrate model calculations and obtained results are then analyzed. The developed model has been applied on a real-life project in order to demonstrate its applicability and practicality. Incorporating learning development effect into LOB scheduling provides for more realistic forecast of repetitive projects duration and/or cost. The proposed model provides both academics and practitioners with an effective tool for scheduling repetitive projects based on realistic assumptions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: learning development effect; line of balance; repetitive projects; scheduling; work continuity
Index terms: variation, practitioner, line of balance, scheduling, mathematical model, duration, modelling, productivity, repetitive project
Subjects: practitioner, mathematical modelling, analytical methods, operations research, contractual condition, production management, management, project controls
Topics: Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here