Bayram, S and Al-Jibouri, S (2018) Cost forecasting using RCF: A case study for planning public building projects costs in Turkey. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(5), pp. 405-417. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Many construction projects are perceived to perform badly since the majority of them suffer cost overruns. This paper analyses cost estimates produced by two most commonly used estimation methods for building projects in Turkey, namely unit area cost (UAC) and unit price analysis (UPA). It also investigates whether reference class forecasting (RCF) method can be used to provide the client with more certainty in the final project cost forecasts compared to those two methods. Data from 369 public building projects in Turkey were collected and cost overruns were analysed. Part of the data representing 14% of the projects were randomly selected and used as control group for testing the reliability of the forecasts produced using RCF. The results have shown the estimates of the final project cost produced using the UAC and UPA methods in Turkey are either too pessimistic or optimistic. The results have also shown that it is possible to use the reference class as a basis to produce a reasonably accurate prediction of the actual cost of a project in a similar class for various levels of acceptable risks. This is achieved by adding uplifts/reductions to the estimates produced by the two traditional methods.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost forecasting; optimism bias; reference class forecasting; unit area cost; unit price analysis |
| Index terms: | optimism bias, estimation, public building, cost overrun, forecasting, testing, actual cost, estimate, Turkey, construction project, cost estimate, cost forecasting, uplift, project cost, case study |
| Subjects: | prediction and forecasting, economics, structural engineering, cognitive psychology, data collection methods, construction type, financial and cost management, Geography, production management, professional practice |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Cost Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here