Dixit, V; Chaudhuri, A and Srivastava, R K (2018) Procurement scheduling in engineer procure construct projects: A comparison of three fuzzy modelling approaches. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(3), pp. 189-206. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Procurement stage connects engineering and construction stages of engineer procure construct (EPC) projects. Scientific materials management is vital to ensure timely material availability to reduce inventory shortage and holding costs. Procurement scheduling of such projects is challenging due to imprecise estimation of activity durations and lead times and stage budget constraints. Fuzzy modelling can incorporate and analyse such imprecise data. In literature multiple fuzzy approaches are applied in different contexts. But a study which provides roadmap to select best solution approach in absence of standardized methodologies and benchmark results in EPC projects is missing. This study compares three fuzzy modelling approaches: crisp approach, fuzzy multi-objective (FMO) approach and crisp multi-objective (CMO) approach based on manner and extent to which they exploit available fuzzy information, computational efficiency and concurrence of results. Results reveal that crisp approach is computationally efficient, FMO approach leverages fuzzy information maximum and CMO approach closely aligns with managerial intuition.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | computational efficiency; crisp approach; crisp multi-objective approach; engineer-procure-construct projects; fuzzy models; fuzzy multi-objective approach; managerial intuitions; procurement scheduling |
| Index terms: | scheduling, engineer-procure-construct, methodology, intuition, materials management, inventory, efficiency, budget constraint, estimation, lead time, modelling, duration, construction stages |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, project delivery, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, operations research, operations management, cognitive psychology, project controls, inventory management, performance management, research methods |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Time Control, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here