Samaraweera, A; Senaratne, S and Sandanayake, Y G (2018) Methodology to extract underlying basic assumptions of a public sector construction project culture: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(6), pp. 467-481. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Identifying underlying basic assumptions of a construction project team brings insightfulness to cultural studies and is useful for managing project changes. However, methodological issues create barriers to such studies due to difficulties in capturing basic assumptions. This paper adopts an exploratory case study of a public sector building construction project to identify an appropriate methodology for data collection and test the ability to analyse the collected data for the purpose of extracting underlying basic assumptions of a construction project culture. Data were collected using interviews and observations, and analysed by code-based content analysis. Research findings confirm the suitability of questioning on internal integration and external adaptation problems of the construction project team to extract basic assumptions while highlighting the necessity of questioning on conflicting and critical situations of the project. Accordingly, several basic assumptions for client and consultant sub-cultural groups were identified. The methodology proposed in this study can be extended to explore basic assumptions of contractor sub-cultural group and then of the whole project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | basic assumptions; construction project culture; exploratory case study; methodologies; project team; public sector; Sri Lanka; sub-cultures |
| Index terms: | public sector building, project team, Sri Lanka, public sector, adaptation, construction project team, case study, suitability, construction project, methodology, integration, content analysis, interview |
| Subjects: | research methods, Geography, production management, organizational analysis, design criteria, administrative law, user focus, construction type, data collection methods, project delivery, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here