Risk management workshop application: A case study of Ahwaz Urban Railway project

Tavakolan, M and Mohammadi, A (2018) Risk management workshop application: A case study of Ahwaz Urban Railway project. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(3), pp. 260-274. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Effective risk management is a vital part of project management. The previous workshops in the construction industry have shown to suffer from the lack of a comprehensive risk management techniques. This paper aims to investigate the capacity of a workshop as a risk management approach through the analysis of risk management for Ahwaz Urban Railway project. The analysed workshop uses brainstorming, the combination of fuzzy and failure mode and effect analysis and multiple-choice questions to identify, evaluate and determine the best responses to risks, respectively. The workshop examination shows that a workshop gives the organization an opportunity to identify critical risks. Furthermore, it helps the organization staff to have a better understanding of the project's environment and provides chances to improve teamwork. Despite the strengths of the workshop, it has several limitations of its own. The participants should be the project's major stakeholders and the workshop requires time and money. Two of the major limitations of the analysed workshop are time limitation, and lack of risk monitoring and controlling experience. In addition, this study does not investigate the relationship between risks. However, more attempts are needed to address challenges and barriers of risk management implementation in construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; fuzzy sets; project management; risk analysis; risk management
Index terms: failure mode, case study, teamwork, workshop, fuzzy set, monitoring, risk management, construction industry, implementation, project management, risk analysis
Subjects: industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, environmental hazards, project management theory and practice, management, contractual arrangements, control systems, reliability engineering, construction type, risk assessment, data collection methods
Topics: Sustainability, Procurement, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here