Social network analysis for construction crews

Abbsaian-Hosseini, S A; Liu, M and Hsiang, S M (2019) Social network analysis for construction crews. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(2), pp. 113-127. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Construction crews usually have to share the limited working space with each other during construction to perform their tasks, which increases the chance of interference/conflict and productivity lost. Social network analysis (SNA) has been known as a methodology to determine the conditions of social structures by investigating the interdependencies among a set of actors. The impact of jobsite social network on the performance of the crews has not been well documented in previous research. This research proposes an analytical approach by combining SNA and work plan variation analysis to (1) quantify the influence construction crews receive from jobsite social network, and (2) explore the impact of jobsite social network on the crews' performance particularly on their work plan variation through a case study. The results indicated that there is a positive monotonic association between each of the centrality indices (representing network influence on each crew) and each of the work plan variability indices (representing crew's performance). The more influences a crew receives form the network, the more work plan variation it will have. A better understanding of the existing jobsite interdependencies will help project managers to control it through better planning and leadership, consequently increasing jobsite productivity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: centrality; construction crews; interdependency; productivity; social network analysis; variations; work plan
Index terms: methodology, variation, social network analysis, social network, social structure, variability, productivity, case study, project manager
Subjects: data collection methods, profession, statistical analysis, sociology, social theory, contractual condition, research methods, management
Topics: Contract Administration, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here