Evaluating issues and outcomes associated with public-private partnership housing project delivery: Tanzanian practitioners' preliminary observations

Kavishe, N; Jefferson, I and Chileshe, N (2019) Evaluating issues and outcomes associated with public-private partnership housing project delivery: Tanzanian practitioners' preliminary observations. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(4), pp. 354-369. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are being viewed as the next best alternative procurement option in the construction sector, particularly in developing countries such as Tanzania. This preliminary study aims to investigate the following aspects of PPP (PPPH) housing project delivery: (1) cost and affordability; (2) the influence of sustainability factors; and (3) the associated benefits which, despite the plethora of PPP-related studies, few have specifically examined. To achieve these objectives, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 28 stakeholders from Tanzania. Frequency analysis and one-sample t-tests were used to rank and identify the significant factors and outcomes of HPPP adoption. The most critical cost and affordability factors were that PPP procurement: (1) is economical compared to traditional methods; (2) offers value for money; and (3) can facilitate affordable housing supply outcomes. The major sustainability factors were beginning sustainability assessment from the feasibility stage and considering sustainability in project viability evaluation. Encouraging private sector innovation and management skills, risk sharing and value for money were found to be among HPPP delivery benefits. These findings provide insights for PPP policy and practitioners in understanding the significant factors in PPPH delivery.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benefits; cost and affordability; housing projects; public and private agencies; public-private partnership; sustainability; Tanzania
Index terms: partnership, private sector, Tanzania, option, affordable housing, survey, housing project, sustainability assessment, developing country, affordability, value-for-money, agency, construction sector, questionnaire, practitioner
Subjects: partnership management, housing and residential development, sociology, decision analysis, industry analysis, sustainability assessment, Geography, evaluation, development economics, economic analysis, construction type, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, International Construction, Value Management, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here