Determining strategic clusters and performance of construction organizations in South Africa

Oyewobi, L O; Windapo, A O; Rotimi, J O B and Jimoh, R A (2019) Determining strategic clusters and performance of construction organizations in South Africa. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(1), pp. 46-56. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This study examines the linkage of strategic clusters and performance of South African organizations, using Porter's generic strategies to determine whether differences exist between clustered organizations in terms of performance, characteristics, resources and capability and how the companies achieve strategic fit within different environments. A questionnaire survey was used to collect data from construction companies registered in Grades 7–9 on the cidb contractor register. The study results show that four clusters of construction organizations exist in the South African construction industry; that the four strategic groups exhibited the characteristics of Miles and Snow's Taxonomy of Strategies; and that human resource capabilities were significantly different across the groups. However, the results show no statistically significant differences among the clusters in terms of performance. It emerged that all the respondents' organizations placed a high premium on employee satisfaction as a measure of achieving success. This study thus proved empirically that different clusters of organizations exist within the South African construction industry, and that they exhibit the characteristics of defenders, prospectors, analysers and reactors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cluster analysis; competitive advantage; organizational performance and strategic clusters
Index terms: organizational performance, construction industry, taxonomy, satisfaction, construction organization, competitive advantage, linkage, questionnaire, human resource, cluster analysis, strategic fit, South Africa, construction company, survey, strategy
Subjects: market analysis, industry analysis, performance measurement, management, Geography, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, organization, business, data collection methods
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here