Stamatiou, D R I; Kirytopoulos, K A; Ponis, S T; Gayialis, S and Tatsiopoulos, I (2019) A process reference model for claims management in construction supply chains: The contractors' perspective. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(5), pp. 382-400. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Claims are an unavoidable burden for every construction project. They stem from risks that have unfortunately been realized in a project and how they will be pursued is up to company strategy, operational particularities and managers' skills and experience. Claims, in general, have an adverse effect on a project's supply chain by compromising actors' relationships, project implementation and project outcomes. It is imperative that all contractors follow a well-designed claims management strategy that is guided by well-defined and accurately documented operational processes outlined in detail. Process models related to claims management are scarcely found in the literature. These models are evaluated and a new process reference model, that attempts to improve the claims management process and rectify the identified shortcomings of existing models, such as a lack of transactions between the contractor and other supply chain actors, is proposed. In doing so, a number of process models are created. The objective of this paper is to prescribe the claims management process as an integral process to the supply chain of a construction project in an effort to raise awareness of this relationship and provide a holistic view to claims management through a supply chain management lens.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | claims management; construction; process modelling; reference model; supply chain management |
| Index terms: | project outcome, management strategy, implementation, construction supply chain, strategy, manager, process modelling, construction project |
| Subjects: | production management, management, contractual arrangements, design analysis, construction logistics, practitioner, project completion |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Supply Chain Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here