Adaptive reuse in sustainable development

Tam, V W Y and Hao, J J L (2019) Adaptive reuse in sustainable development. International Journal of Construction Management, 19(6), pp. 509-521. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

An adaptive reuse is distinct from other projects as it redevelops existing buildings. It is often described as a process by which structurally-sound-old-buildings are developed as economically viable. Our society is very dynamic and goes through a lot of changes to keep up the built environment changing requirements. This results in a high amount of existing old and abandoned buildings which represent a substantial resource in Toronto's city. Adaptive reuse is a variety of repairing or alternating existing buildings that allow it to serve contemporary uses while preserving features from the past. Adaptive reuse reduces consumption which has been produced and is responsive to the environment which forms the basis of a new way of thinking. The paper suggests that adaptive reuse is an innovative and flexible planning tool for management of built capital. This method is promoted and considered as a sustainable development in Toronto. As every other development schemes, adaptive reuse comes along with its own advantages and disadvantages which are analysed in this paper. Of the broad spectrum of factors associated with adaptive reuse, the emphasis is put on the assessment of environmental, social and economical factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adoptive reuse; Canada; sustainable; Toronto; weighting and ranking system
Index terms: adaptive reuse, consumption, sustainable development, Toronto, built environment, society, Canada
Subjects: sustainable design, Geography, infrastructure and transport systems, consumer economics, communities and social development, health safety and environment
Topics: Health and Safety, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here