Ammar, M A (2020) Efficient modeling of time-cost trade-off problem by eliminating redundant paths. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(7), pp. 812-821. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Time-cost trade-off (TCTO) is a traditional decision-making problem in construction management. Numerous optimization techniques have been developed to solve such problem; however, they are not applicable to large-sized projects. Although heuristic methods can handle large-sized problems, they do not guarantee optimum solution. In a project network, the proper sequence of activities can be maintained by allowing a precedence constraint for each path. In practice, only small number of paths are dominant while others are redundant. In this paper, an efficient optimization model is developed to minimize project direct cost where redundant paths are eliminated, precise activity discrete time-cost relationship is used and overlap between activities is permitted. The optimization model is formulated in the standard form of zero-one programming. The model requires as inputs: discrete utility data of activities, precedence relationships and overlap between consecutive activities. Details of model formulation is illustrated by an example project and then is validated by a real-life project. Based on the obtained results, the developed model is compared with traditional optimization models. The developed model guarantees optimal solution and can be applied efficiently to large-sized projects. The proposed approach provides both academicians and practitioners with an efficient technique that produces optimal solution based on realistic assumptions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | optimization; redundant paths; scheduling; time-cost trade-off; zero-one programming |
| Index terms: | time-cost trade-off, modelling, heuristic, direct cost, optimization technique, practitioner, programming, decision-making, precedence relationship, scheduling, project network, guarantee |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, programming, practitioner, operations research, project planning, analytical methods, contract structure, quantity surveying, economics, algorithms, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Cost Management, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here