Honorée, A L; Morgan, Y C T and Krenn, M (2020) Heights of privilege: Economic and cultural determinants of skyscraper height across the world. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(7), pp. 761-774. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Despite the global boom in skyscraper construction, the drivers of skyscraper height are still poorly understood. While extant research primarily focuses on economic determinants of skyscraper height, this article conceptualizes the skyscraper as a cultural artefact and hypothesizes that skyscraper height may also be contingent on a country’s cultural environment. The dependent variable in this study measures the architectural height of the tallest skyscraper in a sample of 90 countries. Economic covariates capture effects on height by zoning regulations, land value, relative rents, taxes and subsidies, GDP growth rate, real interest rate and potential agglomeration economies. The cultural covariates are drawn from Hofstede’s (Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 1st ed., Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 1980) cultural dimensions framework and include country indices for power distance, individualism, masculinity and uncertainty avoidance. The results of multiple regression analysis show significant effects of several economic covariates on skyscraper height and reveal a significant effect of cross-country differences in power distance indices on skyscraper height. As such, cross-country differences in the degree to which the less powerful members of a society accept and expect that power is distributed unequally may constrain or enable real estate developers and construction companies in how tall to propose and build skyscrapers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cultural determinants; economic determinants; skyscraper height |
| Index terms: | determinant, dependent variable, regulation, subsidy, masculinity, multiple regression analysis, dimension, construction company, land, real estate, artefact, interest rate, publication, society, skyscraper, privilege, zoning |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, construction type, sociology, economic analysis, urban planning, research dissemination and communication, real estate economics, organization, political science, risk assessment, communities and social development, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Ethics, Information Management, Governance, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here