Kavishe, N and Chileshe, N (2020) Driving forces for adopting public-private partnerships in Tanzanian housing projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(8), pp. 912-927. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Despite the vast documentation of the PPP research in many countries, the PPP research in the context of Tanzania is lacking, let along the housing sector of Tanzania. To address this knowledge gap, the purpose of this paper is to identify the driving forces for adopting PPPs in Tanzanian housing projects. Second is to examine how driving forces differ between the public and private sector respondents. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 public and private sector practitioners to collect data and the interview transcripts were analysed using NVivo (version 10 package). Direct content analysis was used to validate the findings and provide in-depth insights into the findings. The results shows that out of the 19 driving forces identified, the top 3 driving forces for PPP adoption in Tanzania for the public sector respondents are 'the need for redeveloping condemned properties', 'lack of enough financial capacity to undertake housing projects' and 'fear to lose their condemned properties'. In contrast, the top driving forces for the private sector are 'prime location' and 'being a previous tenant'.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | driving forces; housing projects; public–private partnership; Tanzania |
| Index terms: | Tanzania, package, public sector, private sector, partnership, interview, housing project, documentation, tenant, content analysis, practitioner, housing |
| Subjects: | construction type, data collection methods, practitioner, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, Geography, professional development, partnership management, housing and residential development, industry analysis, administrative law |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Procurement, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here