Kurtzer, D; Blackmore, N; Farrugia, N and Chileshe, N (2020) Productivity enablers and inhibiting health and wellbeing practices of South Australian construction site-based workers: A qualitative study. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(8), pp. 882-899. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This study is aimed at analyzing the perceptions of South Australian construction site-based blue-collared workers on the enablers and inhibiting health and wellbeing practices, establish their impact on the physical abilities, safety performance and overall productivity of older workers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 construction practitioners. Content analysis and associated techniques of word frequency analysis and coding were used for data analysis. The findings showed some consensus on the factors affecting the health and wellbeing practices with obesity, smoking and higher alcohol consumption among the risk factors and prevalent lifestyles among the workers. The 'weather' was identified among the highly ranked physical factors affecting productivity. The study also established the higher prevalence of health and, mental issues, injuries and recreational usage of drugs among the workers. Solutions are proposed for overcoming the identified inhibiting practices. This study was the first research to investigate the perceptions of South Australian construction site-based workers on the enablers and inhibiting health and wellbeing practices and associated consequences among older workers within the South Australian construction sector. The findings of this study offer insights in terms of creating awareness of the degrading health and well-being of construction workers, in particular, the ageing workforce.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ageing workforce; blue-collared workers; health and well-being; South Australia |
| Index terms: | lifestyle, productivity, qualitative study, South Australia, construction worker, risk factor, construction practitioner, construction site, content analysis, health and wellbeing, data analysis, injury, interview, safety performance, alcohol, weather, obesity, construction sector, consumption, physical factor |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management, demography, professional development, management, physical geography and landforms, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, work location, psychology, practitioner, consumer economics, research design and methodology, mental health and wellbeing, air quality, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here