A canvas model for risk assessment and performance estimation in public-private partnerships

Kuru, K and Artan, D (2020) A canvas model for risk assessment and performance estimation in public-private partnerships. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(6), pp. 704-719. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Public-private partnership (PPP) is being widely used to meet the growing infrastructure and service demand. However, previous literature draws attention to distressed or failed PPP projects due to significant risks. In the quest for assessing risks and estimating the performance at the outset of a project, there is a need for a practical tool allowing in-depth analysis of the project conditions. This paper aims to develop a PPP Canvas which enables assessment of the project risk factors and determining the related compensation mechanisms that can be used to mitigate these risks or allocate them to the parties in a balanced way. The Canvas also helps to estimate a project performance score based on the significance coefficients determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process. AHP results show that stability of economic environment, political support and government intervention are the most important risk factors in the local context. AHP can be repeated for each specific PPP project, as part of the PPP Canvas process, to foster discussion and analysis of the risks and compensation mechanisms across different geographical locations and PPP project types. The paper adds a new dimension to PPP risk assessment by making use of the Business Model Canvas approach and the inclusion of contractual compensation and penalty mechanisms. As the stakeholders become more informed of the project conditions and the risks involved, they can make better decisions throughout the project life-cycle and can benefit from the identified compensation mechanisms in contract drafting.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: analytical hierarchy process; compensation mechanisms; contract drafting; critical success factors; performance estimation; public-private partnership; risk assessment; risk factors
Index terms: estimating, critical success factor, project risk factor, stability, penalty, analytical hierarchy process, dimension, compensation, estimate, project performance, risk factor, business model, risk assessment, estimation, partnership, contract drafting
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management, contract formation, control systems, dispute resolution, business, regulatory law, decision-making and optimization, environmental hazards, partnership management, project management theory and practice, financial risk, project risk, structural engineering
Topics: Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here