Case-based insights into rework costs of residential building projects in China

Liu, Q; Ye, G; Feng, Y; Wang, C and Peng, Y (2020) Case-based insights into rework costs of residential building projects in China. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(4), pp. 347-355. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Rework has been identified as a major cause of cost overran of residential building projects. This study aims to investigate the magnitude of rework costs generated by different sources for residential building projects in China. Six residential building projects were selected as sample cases; rework activities and their detailed cost information were collected and analysed. The result revealed that average rework cost of residential building projects was 4.95% of the total project cost. The majority of rework costs were generated by three sources including contractor field management (20.10%), design management (18.91%) and client management (14.73%). It was also found that the main liability bearers of rework costs did not take corresponding responsibilities. The establishment of rework costs allocation mechanism is therefore required to enhance the sense of responsibility among different entities. The magnitude of rework cost may well motivate them take collaborative actions to reduce rework cost. This article provides valuable empirical data for practitioners to understand the major sources of rework costs and main liability-bearers. Therefore, practitioners can take targeted measures to address certain key factors that cause rework based on the data. Above all, this study will bring benefit to the construction industry as well as the whole society.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; China; liability bearers; residential building; rework cost
Index terms: practitioner, design management, China, liability, society, project cost, rework, construction industry, case study, residential building, cost information
Subjects: liability law, industry analysis, communities and social development, accounting and finance, economics, design process, Geography, operations management, construction type, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here