Disputes in time bar provisions for contractors' claims in standard form of contracts

Seneviratne, K and Michael, G V (2020) Disputes in time bar provisions for contractors' claims in standard form of contracts. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(4), pp. 335-346. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The time bar clause facilitates informing the Engineer (Contract Administrator) in a timely manner of the occurrence of events that may result in delayed completion and/or incur additional costs. Such notices allow parties to mitigate any potential impacts in terms of time and/or cost. Nevertheless, the time bar clause forfeits a contractor’s claim, if the notice of claim is not submitted within the stipulated time in the contract, giving rise to numerous disputes. The purpose of this study is to identify the disputes surrounding the time bar clause in the FIDIC 1999 Red Book, which is an internationally used Standard Form of Contract (SFoC) for building and engineering works designed by the employer. After identifying the sources of disputes and modifications to the standard provisions via a comprehensive literature review, the researchers conducted an online questionnaire survey with 61 construction contract professionals (employers, contract consultants and contractors) and semi-structured interviews with four contract specialists to determine the level of agreement with the identified sources of disputes and modifications to standard provisions. Sources of disputes and modifications were ranked based on the Relative Agreement Index (RAI) from the survey. Interviews were qualitatively analyzed to identify agreement/disagreement and the reasons for the agreement/disagreement.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: claims; disputes; FIDIC; time bar provisions; UAE
Index terms: notices, standard form of contract, FIDIC, engineer, dispute, construction contract, contract administrator, interview, survey, literature review, questionnaire
Subjects: standard forms of contract, contract type, profession, contractual role, data collection methods, practitioner, dispute resolution, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements
Topics: Roles and Professions, Procurement, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here