AlHamouri, K; Caldas, C H; Hwang, B G; Krishnankutty, P and de Oliveira, D P (2021) Utilization of workface planning for the execution of maintenance activities, shutdowns and turnarounds in petrochemical facilities: A case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(11), pp. 1115-1129. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Maintenance activities, shutdowns and turnarounds (MST) are essential for the process industry. In fact, MST projects play important roles in maintaining the consistency of plants' productive capacity thus helping sustain corporate performance. Unfortunately, MST projects often incur significant budget and schedule overruns. This study documents the current state of practice of execution planning for MST projects. It identifies several factors that contribute to MST performance being poor. These factors include inefficiencies in execution planning, communication, scope management, measurement and control and execution safety. Utilizing input from subject matter experts (SMEs), the first part of this study focuses on developing a customized version of Workface Planning (WFP) that would be applicable to MSTs in the petrochemical industry. Once customized, the WFP tools were implemented by several petrochemical facilities. By observing this implementation, the research team was able to assess the existing levels of MST execution planning and management and to discover areas of inefficiency. This study offers ways to optimize the planning practices of executing MST. Petrochemical organizations could use these findings to assess their own current MST execution-planning procedures. This would involve implementing the customized WFP concepts and tools and thereby attain an optimal state of readiness before starting the MST execution phase.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | execution planning; maintenance activities; petrochemical industry; shutdowns and turnarounds; workface planning |
| Index terms: | documents, shutdown, case study, implementation, corporate performance, schedule overrun |
| Subjects: | project controls, professional development, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Research Practice, Information Management, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here