Badawy, M; Hussein, A; Elseufy, S M and Alnaas, K (2021) How to predict the rebar labours' production rate by using ANN model. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(4), pp. 427-438. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Production rates are considered as an essential aspect of construction industry because they are the indicators of the productivity efficiency of construction sector. However, there is a gap in identifying factors affecting rebar workers and their production rate. This study tries to bridge this gap by developing a neural network model for estimating rebar labour’s production rates. A questionnaire has been distributed and statistical software program was used to analyze the collected data. Two methods were used for analysis. The first depends on relative importance index, whereas the second depends on the probability and the impact. The results indicate that 'project type' is the most important factor affecting the productivity. A model was estimated to predict rebar labours' productivity. Reliable values have been successfully predicted by artificial neural network. This article presents a software program, which is used to measure the production rate (Output) based on the data provided in the form of factors affecting the rebar labour (Input). This helps to measure productivity growth in a low-cost residential building. In addition, it supports fundamentals building by predicting the production rate of rebar labour, to establish a database for executed projects in the future to develop productivity estimation process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural network; influencing factors; production rate; rebar workers; regression; relative importance index |
| Index terms: | database, estimation, productivity, efficiency, residential building, influencing factor, construction industry, rebar, artificial neural network, relative importance index, neural network, estimating, construction sector, questionnaire, program |
| Subjects: | data management, industry analysis, performance management, software systems, management, modelling and simulation, building materials, financial and cost management, artificial intelligence, risk assessment, construction type, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here