Buertey, J T; Dadadzogbor, E and Atsrim, F (2021) Procurement path influencing factors in Ghana: Managing the challenge of cultural shift. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(1), pp. 78-92. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
An integrated procurement planning effort is a precursor for the successful delivery of projects. For traditional reasons, the Ghanaian construction industry has a challenge of cultural shift in the adoption of contemporary procurement systems. This research sought to investigate factors influencing the continuous use of Design Bid Build (DBB) and the main procurement path influencing factors. Using quantitative methods, findings from the field study indicated that familiarity with the DBB has been the driver for the continuous use of DBB. It was established that the main challenges of DBB were high cost and schedule overruns and high variations. On the other hand, the main procurement influencing factors were identified as early start and completion, firm prices before committing to precede, reduction in cost and schedule overruns. It was evident from the study that the Ghanaian construction industry is not ready for cultural shift in procurement strategies, and may continue to embrace the DBB. It is recommended that contractor selection for projects should not necessarily be based on bulk volume of works but the unit of work. This would enhance the early selection of a contractor, whose early involvement would bring to bear buildability, increased contractor’s responsibility and reduce project risk.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design and build; design bid build; planning; procurement; procurement delivery; traditional |
| Index terms: | buildability, field study, design and build, quantitative method, variation, design-bid-build, schedule overrun, Ghana, procurement strategy, influencing factor, contractor selection, construction industry, procurement system |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, design efficiency, project controls, Geography, contractual condition, tendering, research methods, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Time Control, Design Practice, Procurement, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here