Low-cost housing policies and squatters struggles in Nigeria: The Nigerian perspective on possible solutions

Ebekozien, A; Abdul-Aziz, A R and Jaafar, M (2021) Low-cost housing policies and squatters struggles in Nigeria: The Nigerian perspective on possible solutions. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(11), pp. 1088-1098. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This paper investigated the low-cost housing (LCH) policies in regard to squatters and offered a descriptive comparative analysis that affords insights into the Malaysian potential squatter zero programmes that could be applied to tackle the long-standing chronic urban slums in Nigerian cities. To achieve this, data were collected via in-depth oral interviews. Phenomenological type of qualitative research and snowball type of non-probability sampling technique was adopted respectively. MAXQDA 2018 with the support of thematic analysis was employed to analyze the three themes generated, and five major cities in Nigeria were covered. The study found that rural-urban migration, unemployment, high cost of the rental fee, inability to access housing loan and shortages of LCH were the reasons people engaged in squatting. From the findings, weak institutional framework, corruption, inadequate LCH policy, political will, and absence of national housing database emerged as the major hindrances to the implementation of LCH programmes that could have mitigated squatting. Nigerian Government should strengthen public housing institutions via a strong institutional framework for the sustainability of LCH programmes and tackle corruption head-on. This can be achieved if the government sees LCH provision as one of the major pillars and synergy with other constructs of welfare.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: housing policies; institutional framework; low-cost housing; Malaysia experience; squatters; Nigeria
Index terms: implementation, Nigeria, shortages, housing policy, synergy, Malaysia, corruption, low-cost housing, housing, sampling, public housing, unemployment, programme, interview, comparative analysis, database, qualitative research, thematic analysis, migration, slum
Subjects: professional ethics, data collection methods, housing and residential development, research design and methodology, contractual arrangements, data management, data analysis and analytics, methods and analysis, demography, project controls, urban design, partnership management, public policy, construction type, Geography, economic analysis
Topics: Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Governance, Time Control, Procurement, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here