Eid, M S; Elbeltagi, E E and El-Adaway, I H (2021) Simultaneous multi-criteria optimization for scheduling linear infrastructure projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(1), pp. 41-55. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This paper presents a simultaneous multi-criteria optimization approach for scheduling linear infrastructure projects. The proposed model provides planners with sets of non-dominated alternatives and their corresponding tradeoffs. The associated research methodology includes: (1) developing a resource driven scheduling module; (2) applying a multi-criteria optimization technique to optimize the multi-objective scheduling problem; (3) integrating the proposed model with a commercial project management software; and (4) applying the developed model on two literature-drawn case studies. The developed multi-criteria optimization approach utilizes Genetic Algorithms and Pareto Front sorting. The resulting sets of schedules are based on the multiple inter-conflicting objectives of simultaneously minimizing project duration, minimizing cost, minimizing interruptions, and minimizing unit delivery delays. The results indicate that the proposed approach can explore a greater range of solutions compared to existing models. The developed multi-criteria optimization approach can aid planners with proposing optimal set of schedules.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision analysis; multi-criteria optimization; repetitive; schedules |
| Index terms: | genetic algorithm, scheduling, tradeoff, project management software, case study, optimization technique, decision analysis, planner, research methodology, module, infrastructure project, duration |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, algorithms, infrastructure and transport systems, project controls, decision analysis, data collection methods, profession, research design and methodology, digital technology, operations research |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Design Practice, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here