Exploring the best ANN model based on four paradigms to predict delay and cost overrun percentages of highway projects

El-Kholy, A M (2021) Exploring the best ANN model based on four paradigms to predict delay and cost overrun percentages of highway projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(7), pp. 694-712. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This study explores the best models in predicting delay and cost overrun percentages (PDCOP) for highway projects depending on four ANNs-based paradigms: principal component analysis (PCA), modular neural network, REF/GRNN/PNN network and time-lag recurrent network. The best model among 28 developed for predicting % delay based on modular neural network paradigm with: PCA as an input projection algorithm, Online training as weight update, Sigmoid Axon as transfer function, Momentum (0.7) as learning rule for hidden and output layers gives % prediction with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) equals to 39.8%. Whereas, the best model among 28 developed for % cost overrun, based on PCA paradigm with the same characteristics as best model developed for % delay and learning rate (0.01), has MAPE equals to 25.4%. Furthermore, the best proposed models for PDCOP outperform the previously recently models in literature. MAPE equals to 39.8% for best proposed model for predicting % delay versus 53.68 and 57.68% for linear regression and statistical fuzzy models proposed in literature. Whereas, MAPE equals to 25.4% for best proposed model for predicting % cost overrun versus 30.42 and 40.37% for models in literature, respectively.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost overrun percentage; delay percentage; highway projects; modular neural network; principal component analysis; REF/GRNN/PNN network; time-lag recurrent network
Index terms: neural network, highway construction, paradigm, principal component analysis, statistical fuzzy model, cost overrun
Subjects: education and knowledge transfer, civil engineering, statistical analysis, measurement and scaling, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management
Topics: Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here