Ameh, J O and Odusami, K T (2010) Nigerian building professionals' ethical ideology and perceived ethical judgement. Construction Economics and Building, 10(3), pp. 1-13. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
In recent years, Nigeria is often cited in the international media in connection with corruption and other unethical practices. The professionals in the Nigerian building industry are not immune from the national trend in ethical erosion. Moral philosophy or ethical ideology has been used to explain individuals'reasoning about moral issues and consequent behaviour. This study examines building industry professionals'ethical ideologies with a view to understanding their ethical behaviour in professional practice. In carrying out this investigation, building professionals in clients'organisations, contracting and consultancy organisations within the industry were asked to respond to the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ) designed by Forsyth in order to determine their idealism and relativism level. Subsequently, they were classified into one of four groups, representing different ethical ideologies. The result indicates that the dominant ethical ideology of building industry professionals is situationism. The study predicts that the attitude of building industry professionals in practice, given the current socio-political and economic situation of Nigeria would possibly be unethical because of the extreme influence situational factors have on their behaviour. This finding is a bold step and necessary benchmark for resolving ethical issues within the industry and should be of interest to policy makers. It is also useful for intra professional ethical comparison.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Nigeria; professional; building industry; ethical ideology; ethical judgement |
| Index terms: | ethical behaviour, ethics, philosophy, unethical practices, Nigeria, professional practice, consultancy, building industry, reasoning, building professional, media, corruption, questionnaire, investigation |
| Subjects: | cognitive psychology, sociology, ethical issues, professional ethics, ethical practice, philosophical studies, industry analysis, organization, data collection methods, profession, professional development, Geography |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here