Jalaei, F; Zoghi, M and Khoshand, A (2021) Life cycle environmental impact assessment to manage and optimize construction waste using building information modeling (BIM). International Journal of Construction Management, 21(8), pp. 784-801. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The construction industry has become more interested in moving towards implementing an innovative method to reduce wastes and Environmental Impacts (EIs) during the construction stage. Tools and methods represented in different frameworks to estimate construction wastes are limited to the end of life stage of building projects. A common method employed for this quantification is Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which is globally recognized as one of the most complete methods for the environmental impact assessment of buildings. Building Information Modeling (BIM) would be an ideal platform to integrate LCA to assist in this process. However, BIM and LCA tools are currently not fully interoperable. This research aims to represent a methodology to quantify total waste produced in the building’s lifecycle. The main reasons for producing waste are examined profoundly and some solutions leading to waste reduction are proposed. Additionally, the environmental impact of the materials converted to waste is evaluated in an integrated environment by developing an add-in inside BIM tool, which calculates waste produced in each step of buildings' lifespan to be used by LCA tool. An application of an actual building project will be presented in order to illustrate the usefulness and capabilities of the developed approaches.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; construction waste; demolition and deconstruction; environmental impacts; life cycle assessment |
| Index terms: | lifecycle, estimate, construction industry, construction waste, building information modelling, quantification, platform, environmental impact assessment, life cycle, methodology, environmental impact, waste reduction, lifespan, life cycle assessment, end of life |
| Subjects: | digital design, sustainability assessment, research methods, industry analysis, information systems, measurement and scaling, waste management, environmental impact, value management, material degradation and durability, financial and cost management, project delivery, strategic project management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Sustainability, Construction Materials, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here