Cash flow management techniques practices of local firms in Nigeria

Oladimeji, O and Aina, O O (2021) Cash flow management techniques practices of local firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(4), pp. 395-403. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This article assessed the perceptions of local construction firms (LCFs) on cash flow management techniques (CFMT) practices with the aim of drawing out relevant inferences that will improve firms' cash flow. About 59 LCFs were surveyed out of which 31 firms' questionnaires were fit for analysis. The questionnaire for this study elicited general information about the respondents, their firms and how regular they practice six identified CFMT measured on a five point Likert scale. The result showed that all LCFs are categorised as micro and small business enterprises. All the mean scores were below the midpoint score of 3.00 but greater than 2.00 which indicate a generally fairly practice of CFMT. Most LCFs practiced reduction of profit margin in order to win contracts and CFMT of trade credit (TC) supplies of materials are more frequently practiced than the supplies of labour, and hiring of plants and equipments. LCFs should maximize working capital by assigning profit markup on the criteria of the balance use of cost item base and front-loaded profit markup distribution in presenting a fair bid that will be ethically acceptable. LCFs can also maximize the use of TC supply to achieve highly liquid firms.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cash flow; cash flow management techniques; local construction firms; markup; trade credit
Index terms: Nigeria, cash flow management, drawing, profit, construction firm, cash flow, small business, questionnaire, Likert scale
Subjects: organization, data collection methods, economic analysis, technical documentation, Geography, financial management
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here