Rohman, M A and Wiguna, I P A (2021) Evaluation of road design performance in delivering community project social benefits in Indonesian PPP. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(11), pp. 1130-1142. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the design performance of Indonesian Public–Private Partnership (PPP) toll roads. A purposive sampling was performed to get stakeholders' perception comprehensively involved the government, the private sector and the community. A total of 218 samples was collected and analyzed using mean, reliability analysis, ANOVA and posthoc tests. It was found that eight attributes were considered relevant to measure the toll road project design. Meanwhile, the design performance level was considered moderate. Finally, there was no significant difference in perceptions between the government and the private sector regarding the attributes, but there was a difference in perception between the community, the government and the private sector. These findings can help the stakeholders to understand good design application from the community perspective which can be used to improve toll road design performance for delivering a better project social benefit (PSB) to the community.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community; developing country; good design performance; Indonesia; public private partnerships; success; toll road projects |
| Index terms: | developing country, social benefit, toll, Indonesia, reliability analysis, partnership, private sector, purposive sampling, road project, public private partnership |
| Subjects: | Geography, infrastructure engineering, development economics, theoretical framing, research methods, industry analysis, transportation engineering, partnership management, reliability engineering, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here