Shahhosseini, V and Hajarolasvadi, H (2021) A conceptual framework for developing a BIM-enabled claim management system. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(2), pp. 208-222. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Claims and disputes frequently occur at the end of construction projects. The process of managing the claims is complex and wastefully consumes project resources like time and money. In recent years, the construction industry has been looking for new methods of claim management that are more productive. In response to this need, different knowledge-based expert systems have been developed. A big challenge that can be attributed to all these systems is how to provide input information. The Building Information Model is a rich description of a project. This feature underpins its use as the input of a claim management expert system. This article explores the feasibility of using BIM to provide input information for claim management expert systems. For the purposes of this study, a framework has been proposed to develop a new BIM-enabled claim management system in order to control contractual rules automatically and consistently during a project. In the end, a simple project is modeled to better represent the feasibility of the idea put forth. We believe that the proposed framework provides a useful tool to handle claims in a more reliable and productive manner.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information model; claim management; construction claims; construction disputes; contract management; contract model |
| Index terms: | dispute, construction dispute, construction industry, claim management, contract management, conceptual framework, construction claim, expert system, construction project |
| Subjects: | production management, contractual condition, contract management, theoretical framing, industry analysis, payment, data management, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here