Development of metrics and an external benchmarking program for healthcare facilities

Sharma, V; Caldas, C H and Mulva, S P (2021) Development of metrics and an external benchmarking program for healthcare facilities. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(6), pp. 615-630. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a benchmarking program for healthcare projects. Healthcare construction projects tend to be unique due to varied healthcare facilities and offered services, thus requiring a platform to study distinct project management approaches for the healthcare industry. The idea of continuous improvement through competitive benchmarking is already well established. However, highly targeted comparisons are not possible without industry-specific metrics. The ability to measure project performance allows for credible industry norms and continuous improvement. As a first step, a comprehensive study focused on identifying specific metrics to measure healthcare capital project-performance in key areas such as cost, schedule, change, and best practice implementation was concluded with input from a team comprised of healthcare owners, contractors, and architects. In addition, space/dimensional and program-specific metrics were also identified for this external benchmarking program. This paper presents the development of a framework for different healthcare capital facility-types using absolute and relative metrics for the healthcare industry. The findings include resources for the healthcare community in the form of healthcare facility metrics and project database that enables the process of quantifying the effectiveness and efficiency of processes specific to the healthcare industry of completed and ongoing projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: external benchmarking; healthcare facilities; metrics; owner; planning
Index terms: best practice, capital project, architect, effectiveness, project performance, healthcare industry, implementation, project management, efficiency, platform, owner, continuous improvement, database, construction project, program, industry norm, benchmarking
Subjects: data management, sociology, industry analysis, performance measurement, performance management, software systems, production management, project management theory and practice, digital design, contractual arrangements, strategic project management, profession, business
Topics: Quality Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here