Tengan, C and Aigbavboa, C (2021) Validating factors influencing monitoring and evaluation in the Ghanaian construction industry: A Delphi study approach. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(3), pp. 223-234. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Construction practice globally is characterized with challenges cutting across processes and methods. It is evident also that the mechanisms to mitigate these challenges have not resulted in the desired performance envisaged in the Ghanaian construction industry. Whereas monitoring and evaluation of the projects have been applauded as a panacea to solving this performance challenges, the factors influencing effective monitoring and evaluation systems have not been agreed upon in the Ghanaian construction industry. The qualitative Delphi approach was adopted to validate the factors influencing monitoring and evaluation in the Ghanaian construction industry. Eleven experts concluded a two-stage iterative Delphi study process and reached consensus on all the fourteen (14) factors identified to influence the monitoring and evaluation process to ensure successful project delivery in Ghana. The study agreed that factors such as stakeholder involvement, budgetary allocation, leadership, communication and M&E information systems were needed to ensure effective monitoring and evaluation. The Delphi technique served a vital tool to achieve the objective of the study. It is subsequently recommended for studies that require consensus to be reached on matters that are lingering and being understood in diverse perspectives on the challenges of construction project management. The implication of the finding is for a quality, robust monitoring and evaluation system for project success.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | evaluation; Delphi technique; Ghana; monitoring |
| Index terms: | project success, Delphi method, Ghana, construction project management, monitoring, project delivery, construction industry, Delphi technique, information system, stakeholder involvement |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, Geography, project management theory and practice, participation process, project delivery, data collection methods, control systems |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here