Tripathi, K K; Hasan, A and Neeraj Jha, K (2021) Evaluating performance of construction organizations using fuzzy preference relation technique. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(12), pp. 1287-1300. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Evaluating the performance of construction organizations is of vital importance for their continuous improvement and long-term survival. Performance measurement enables organizations to compare their performance with that of others to remain competitive in the business. Consequently, identification and evaluation of relevant performance measurement factors is an important research agenda. Although performance measurement at the level of projects has been studied in depth, it has not been investigated properly at the level of organization. In an earlier study, the authors had identified 20 performance attributes based on existing literature and grouped them under six performance factors (PFs): profitability and asset management; satisfaction of key stakeholders; predictability of cost and time; environment, health and safety (EHS); quality consciousness and staff turnover. The present study uses consistent fuzzy preference relation (CFPR) to determine the relative weights of these factors and associated performance measurement attributes. The findings indicate that the satisfaction of the key stakeholders is the most important performance measurement factor whereas, staff turnover is the least important factor for performance evaluation. Based on the findings, a user-interface in the form of a user-friendly software has been developed. The interface will help construction organizations in assessing and improving their performance to remain competitive in a highly competitive business environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | consistent fuzzy preference relation; construction organizations; factor analysis; performance attributes; performance factors; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | continuous improvement, performance measurement, construction organization, satisfaction, competitive busines, consciousness, survival, factor analysis, profitability, asset management, survey, turnover, research agenda, health and safety, preference, performance evaluation, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, decision-making and reasoning, performance measurement, statistical analysis, asset management, research management, human factors and perception, organization, data collection methods, project delivery, economic analysis, business management, environmental science |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here