Wong, P S P; Whelan, B and Holdsworth, S (2021) Are contractors ready for greater use of prefabrication in projects? An empirical analysis on the role of unlearning and counter-knowledge. International Journal of Construction Management, 21(4), pp. 353-368. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Despite the recognised benefits of more extensive use of prefabrication in construction projects, a widespread market transformation has yet to occur. One of the key barriers to more extensive adoption of prefabrication is the resistance to practice change within the contractors' firms. Organisational readiness (OR) has been known as the antecedent to the success of practice change. This paper reports a study that aims to examine the factors affecting contractors' OR for more extensive use of prefabrication in projects. Backed by the literature review, a conceptual framework that depicts the inter-relationships among OR, unlearning (UL) and counter knowledge (CK) was proposed and empirically tested in this study. Data were collected from a questionnaire survey conducted in Australia. The results indicated that UL is positively correlated to OR. To build confidence in and gain acceptance by the employees within the contractor firms, long-term benefits for practice change should be articulated. Furthermore, the idea of more extensive use of prefabrication is less likely to be accepted when UL does not take place while CK is present. Inclusive communication within the contractor firms is vital to minimise employees' resistance to practice change. Coercive approaches to practice change, however, may negatively affect OR.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | counter-knowledge; organisational readiness; prefabrication; unlearning |
| Index terms: | prefabrication, market transformation, Australia, contractor firm, conceptual framework, construction project, questionnaire, literature review, survey |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, organization, economic and policy analysis, data analysis and analytics, theoretical framing, production management, Geography, building construction |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here