Aghimien, D; Aigbavboa, C; Oke, A; Thwala, W and Moripe, P (2022) Digitalization of construction organisations: A case for digital partnering. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(10), pp. 1950-1959. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The digitalization of construction organizations is deemed essential with the advent of the fourth industrial revolution. To achieve this, there is a need for construction organizations to partner with other organizations with complementary digital capabilities. This study, therefore, makes a case for digital partnering in the South African construction industry through a survey of construction professionals actively involved in a construction project in the country. Analysis of data gathered was done using a 5-step analysis approach and relevant descriptive and inferential statistics were adopted. Findings revealed that digital partnering is not being adopted among construction organizations in the country. However, if adopted correctly, construction organizations can have a better competitive advantage, improved project performance, and risk reduction through shared digital resources. Furthermore, the barriers to the proper adoption of digital partnering are the poor definition of partnering goal, getting the right digital partner, trust issue, partnering risk issue and investment cost. The study contributes to the body of knowledge as is reveals that construction organizations, particularly in a developing country like South Africa, stands a better chance of surviving the dynamic construction and digital environment by partnering with other organizations within and outside the industry rather than embarking on the digitalization journey alone.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | digital partnering; digital transformation; digitalization; fourth industrial revolution |
| Index terms: | risk reduction, digitalization, developing country, survey, construction project, South Africa, body of knowledge, competitive advantage, partnering, construction organization, transformation, fourth industrial revolution, project performance, construction professional, statistics, construction industry |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, partnership management, market analysis, development economics, professional development, financial risk, project management theory and practice, production management, Geography, technology adoption, knowledge management, digital technology, mathematical modelling, business, organization, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, International Construction, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here