Agyekum, K; Opoku, A; Oppon, A J and Opoku, D G J (2022) Obstacles to green building project financing: An empirical study in Ghana. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(15), pp. 2922-2930. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This study examines the perception of professionals in the Ghanaian construction industry regarding the obstacles to green building project financing. Following an extensive critical comparative review of literature resulting in the identification of ten potential obstacles, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 520 construction industry professionals. Data obtained from the survey were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings from the study revealed that split incentives, risk related barriers, capital expenditure, lack of incentives, and initial capital cost are the key obstacles that hinder green building project financing. The findings further revealed significant differences in the views of the professionals regarding four obstacles to green building project financing. From the discussion, it was realized that for some of the identified obstacles, the differences resulted from the fact that the different professionals have different interests in green building projects, and those interests depict the kind of risks they are exposed to. The value of this paper is to help built environment professionals to understand these obstacles and find a better way of turning these challenges into opportunities for the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction professionals; Ghana; green building projects; obstacles; project financing |
| Index terms: | Ghana, construction industry, statistics, empirical study, construction professional, built environment, survey, capital cost, financing, capital expenditure, green building |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, Geography, professional development, design practice, accounting and finance, research methods, economic analysis, data collection methods, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Design Practice, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here