Al-Abbadi, G M and Agyekum-Mensah, G (2022) The effects of motivational factors on construction professionals productivity in Jordan. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), pp. 820-831. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
In the current economic conditions, improving worker productivity in construction sites is becoming increasingly vital to ensure the success of projects. Multiple factors impact the productivity of workers; however, motivation is considered to be the most important factor. Past studies indicated that low productivity is one of the main challenges facing the construction industry in Jordan. This study is an attempt to explore and rank the motivational factors affecting workers productivity in the Jordanian construction sites. To achieve this objective, a mixed research strategy was adopted involving a survey questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The questionnaire was distributed to key players within the industry and included 16 motivational factors which were derived from past research on motivation. Using the importance index technique, the top 10 factors were identified which included: (1) personal growth/career improvement; (2) pay on time; (3) decision making ability; (4) decent and respectful job; (5) rewards; (6) pay amount; (7) high responsibility job; (8) challenging tasks; (9) work appreciation; and (10) team cooperation. Semi-structured interviews were used to validate the results from the questionnaire and to further understand the importance of worker motivation. The study concluded that if organizations paid attention to these motivational factors, then worker productivity, staff retention, organizational standards and the probability of successful project delivery should all be improved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | motivation; productivity; project management; workers |
| Index terms: | construction industry, Jordan, project delivery, project management, construction professional, productivity, retention, economic condition, becoming, cooperation, decision-making, career, questionnaire, construction site, strategy, survey, motivation, interview |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, project delivery, economic analysis, work location, psychology, professional development, project management theory and practice, Geography, management, philosophical process, industry analysis, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Site Management, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here