System dynamics modeling approach to quantify change orders impact on labor productivity 1: Principles and model development comparative study

Al-Kofahi, Z G; Mahdavian, A and Oloufa, A (2022) System dynamics modeling approach to quantify change orders impact on labor productivity 1: Principles and model development comparative study. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(7), pp. 1355-1366. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

In construction projects, change orders are commonly issued by the owner and may cause interruption to the contractor’s work, resulting in loss of labor productivity, delay, and cost overruns, which may lead to claims. Because of the complexity in linking the cause of the productivity loss to the change order, the relationship is not well understood. The contractor must prove with a credible calculation that the productivity loss was a result of the change order issued by the owner to be able to receive compensation. Compared to all available productivity loss quantification methods, the measured mile approach is considered the most acceptable and popular in litigation. This study is a discourse on the understanding, use, and potential application of system dynamics within quantifying change orders' impact on labor productivity. The model boundary, including Endogenous and Exogenous variables, are identified. After determining the parameters used in modeling, the CLD is constructed to understand the system structure better. A system dynamics model is developed using Vensim software, verified, validated, and utilized to quantitatively measure the influence of the change in the project scope on labor productivity. To examine the applicability of the proposed model, it has been implemented to a real highway construction case study, and the impacts of various variables on labor productivity loss have been studied using the data for two completed highway construction projects from FDOT. The study can be applied to construction projects that faced change orders, and as a result of these changes, the contractor’s performance was affected. The proposed model can be used to determine the primary sources that result in labor productivity loss on a specific type of task.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change orders; construction projects; labor productivity; model development; system dynamic
Index terms: labour productivity, comparative study, highway construction, project scope, modelling, compensation, case study, quantification, litigation, change order, owner, productivity, cost overrun, system dynamics, construction project, complexity, model development
Subjects: financial and cost management, analytical methods, scope management, dispute resolution, computing systems, data collection methods, research design and methodology, systems engineering, measurement and scaling, sociology, production management, contractual condition, management, civil engineering
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Site Management, Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here