Alzraiee, H (2022) Cost estimate system using structured query language in BIM. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(14), pp. 2731-2743. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Projects mainly fail due to inaccurate cost estimates. Building Information Modelling (BIM) provides an opportunity to utilize its database to develop a reliable cost estimate. The existing BIM-Based cost estimate tools rely on quantity extraction of design elements, then apply the cost. This practice has two limitations, first, it diminishes the spatial context of BIM elements, and second, the associated costs are derived from pricing the quantities, not the work items associated with BIM elements. This paper proposes a system to develop a cost estimate for building projects using a Structured Query Language (SQL). The approach leverages SQL to create an interoperable information management system that effectively transacts data with BIM elements. The proposed system harnesses BIM element parameters to drive work items associated with the parameter’s host element. The system applicability is illustrated by developing a cost estimate of a BIM element using the extracted quantities, work items, and methods of construction. The BIM-based cost estimate is compared with a manually prepared cost estimate for the same element. Both estimates are nearly the same, but the efforts to prepare a BIM-based cost estimate were substantially lower than the conventional method.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; cost estimation; quantity takeoff; structured query language |
| Index terms: | pricing, building information modelling, cost estimating, estimate, cost estimate, management system, database |
| Subjects: | management, data management, economic analysis, information systems, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here