Ammar, M A (2022) Optimization of line of balance scheduling considering work interruption. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(2), pp. 305-316. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Line of Balance (LOB) technique is frequently used for scheduling typical repetitive projects, in which crew work continuity is maintained and multiple crews per activity is allowed. Allowing work interruptions intentionally; however, might enhance project performance. The determination of optimum interruption values and the repetitive units at which work interruptions are permitted are challenging problems. Optimization problems have been traditionally solved by two approaches; heuristic methods and optimization techniques. Although heuristic methods can handle large-size projects, they do not guarantee optimal solutions. In this paper, a mathematical optimization model is developed to optimize project duration in LOB scheduling considering work interruption. Constant activity progress rate is assumed, work continuity is maintained, and planned work interruptions are allowed. Optimum interruption values and the activities' interrupted units are determined. Details of model formulation are illustrated by an example project. The developed model is then validated by a case study project and the principal conclusions are drawn. Although work continuity is an essential requirement in LOB scheduling, allowing for planned work interruption enhances project performance. The model can be used to study the project under various scenarios and the project manager can select the best alternative that meets his/her needs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | line of balance; nonlinear programming; optimization; repetitive projects; work interruptions |
| Index terms: | optimization technique, project performance, programming, line of balance, case study, heuristic, duration, repetitive project, guarantee, project manager, scheduling |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, production management, project controls, operations research, programming, profession, contract structure, project management theory and practice, algorithms, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Time Control, Project Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here