Ammar, M A and Abd-ElKhalek, S I (2022) Criticality measurement in fuzzy project scheduling. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(2), pp. 252-261. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Critical path method provides complete time analysis of project activities and identifies the critical ones based on deterministic time and cost estimates. In real-life, duration estimate of project activities contains some sort of uncertainty. Program evaluation and review technique (PERT) has been used early for dealing with uncertainty. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is used to overcome some pitfalls of PERT; however, MCS is time-consuming and requires large amount of data. Accordingly, fuzzy-set theory is used to quantify uncertainty associated with activities' durations. Several fuzzy-based techniques have been proposed; however, some difficulties are encountered in determining late times of activities and degree of criticality. The aim of this article is to present an analytical method for measuring criticality in a project network with fuzzy activity durations. A proposed method for measuring criticality degree (CD) of both project paths and activities is presented, avoiding pitfalls of previous fuzzy methods. Linear fuzzy activities' duration–that is commonly used in construction–is assumed. An example application is worked-out to illustrate the steps of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method is precise and effective for determining CD of both project paths and activities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | criticality degree; fuzzy sets; project activities; project paths; scheduling; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | critical path method, fuzzy method, project network, project scheduling, scheduling, estimate, cost estimate, duration, fuzzy set, programme evaluation and review technique, Monte Carlo simulation |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, operations research, financial and cost management, project planning, data analysis and analytics, project controls, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here