Asamoah, R O; Baiden, B K; Nani, G and Kissi, E (2022) Identifying intangible resources to enhance profitability strategies of small-medium scale construction firms (SMSCFs) in developing countries. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(11), pp. 2207-2214. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Profit sustainability by Small-Medium Scale Construction Firms (SMSCFs) is a major concern for the parties in the construction industry. Additionally, identifying efficient and effective use of resources has been a challenge. The study sought to identify intangible resources that will enhance the profitability strategies of small construction firms. Purposive sampling was used to identify professionals who were Owners/managers. Relative Important Index was used for ranking and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance to measure the degree of agreement of the ranking among the professional groups. Employer’s experience, client trust, employee experience, patent and copy-right, networking were the key intangible resources. There was a high degree of agreement between the selected professionals on the ranking. Small construction firms are encouraged to improve their understanding of the political and economic environment in which they operate. This study highlights intangibles resources that parties in the building construction industry should be conscious of. It further provides an opportunity for researchers in construction management to interrogate the impact of these resources within the wider industry as the study was limited to building professionals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | intangibles resources; profitability; relative important index; small firms |
| Index terms: | small construction firm, owner, profitability, building professional, construction industry, purposive sampling, developing country, manager, profit, construction firm, networking, strategy, building construction, intangible resource |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, asset management, sociology, building construction, development economics, research methods, management, economic analysis, communication, practitioner, organization, profession |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, International Construction, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here