Understanding the language of chaos

Hill, C (1999) Understanding the language of chaos. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1999, Liverpool, UK.

Abstract

From discussions with senior managers, project managers and site managers at a national contractor, it became clear that the labels they applied to things, the terms which they used to describe circumstances, had influence over their subsequent actions. In particular, the same situation on a construction project may be described as 'chaos', or as 'disorder'. If 'chaos' is chosen, a sense of uncontrollability is conveyed, and the manager is less likely to act positively. If 'disorder' is applied, the manager will act positively to bring about order, to manage. The two terms could be applied to identical situations. This paper concerns exploratory research into the linguistics of the managers, and their shared understandings of the meanings conveyed by terms. The paper briefly introduces the notion of the constitutive nature of communication and discourse, and shows how this impacts upon the behaviour of managers. Ethnomethodology was adopted to develop a commonly accepted understanding of terminology for the researcher and the practitioners. Further, this paper provides an insight into one of the fundamental meanings of the term to 'manage', as expressed by active managers in construction.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: discourse; ethnomethodology; language
Index terms: practitioner, exploratory research, site manager, construction project, ethnomethodology, project manager, manager, meaning, national contractor
Subjects: research methods, production management, sociology, profession, practitioner
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here