Boateng, A; Ameyaw, C and Mensah, S (2022) Assessment of systematic risk management practices on building construction projects in Ghana. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(16), pp. 3128-3136. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The construction industry happens to be one of the key sectors of every nation’s economy by way of value creation, employment and contribution to Gross Domestic Product. However, just like other sectors of the economy, the industry is saddled with numerous risks making the achievement of project objectives elusive. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the current risk management practices prevailing in the building construction project delivery in the Ghanaian construction industry. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and analysed using content analysis technique. Quantitative data was obtained through survey questionnaires and analysed using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Respondents were selected from three public Universities and construction firms in the highest building contractor financial class known as D1K1. It was found out that risk management is not implemented in a systematic, deliberate and continuous manner. However, risks are dealt with in an adhoc manner. This practice is at variance with acceptable risk management practices. The findings expose the weaknesses in the project management practice in Ghana. Project managers of large construction firms in Ghana require sound knowledge and training in internationally recognized systematic risk management practices in order to ensure achievement of value for money in construction project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building projects; large construction firms; project managers; risk factors; systematic risk management |
| Index terms: | project delivery, public university, construction industry, risk management, risk factor, Ghana, employment, gross domestic product, building contractor, project manager, variance, value-for-money, questionnaire, value creation, construction project, survey, construction firm, content analysis, building construction, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, project management practice, interview |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, project delivery, risk assessment, profession, data collection methods, organization, practitioner, measurement and scaling, educational institutions, building construction, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, environmental hazards, economic development, management, Geography, production management, project management theory and practice, evaluation |
| Topics: | Education, Value Management, Human Resources, Sustainability, Procurement, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here