Leveraging metacognitive prompts in construction educational games for higher educational gains

Castronovo, F; Van Meter, P N and Messner, J I (2022) Leveraging metacognitive prompts in construction educational games for higher educational gains. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(1), pp. 19-30. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The inclusion of technology in the classroom environment has brought the adoption of a variety of pedagogical intervention such as educational simulation games, which have illustrated a growing potential of stimulating students' learning. In particular, an educational simulation game, the virtual construction simulator (VCS), has been evaluated for its ability to instil in students' construction skills. The goal of this study was to further evaluate the pedagogical potential of specific design features of the VCS, a prompt within the simulation to enhance learning. To evaluate the pedagogical value of the prompt, the research team recruited 65 engineering students to participate in a quasi-experiment. In the experiment, the participants were split into two groups, an experimental group that played with the prompt, and a control group that played without the prompt. Based on a statistical analysis, the research team found that both groups significantly gained problem-solving skills. The experimental group, significantly increased their problem-solving skills when compared to the control group. Based on the analysis of the results the research team provided an insight into the value of metacognitive prompts in educational simulation games. This conclusion can support game developers in considering such prompts in their future games.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction education; engineering education; problem-solving; serious games; simulation games
Index terms: construction education, experiment, classroom, engineering education, statistical analysis, educational games
Subjects: professional education, data science, construction type, data collection methods, educational technology
Topics: Education, Construction Technology, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here