Chen, Q; Garcia de Soto, B and Adey, B (2022) Transshipment approach to coordinate materials for a contractor's project portfolio. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(16), pp. 3065-3076. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The challenges to coordinate material supply and dynamically changing demand always lead to construction interruptions or a considerable waste of materials on-site. Mainstream research has provided various advanced digital solutions to solve these problems; however, they have not addressed how to make reliable decisions with digital models to manage the demand fluctuations of construction materials. This study proposes a transshipment approach to enable the lateral sharing of perishable materials and optimize material allocation for a contractor’s project portfolio. The transshipment approach includes two main steps. First, the daily material supply and demand data are collected from a continuously updated schedule and three-dimensional models as input for calculating unused material quantities. Second, an evolutionary optimization algorithm is used for optimizing the transshipment quantities with minimal cost. As proof of concept, the proposed transshipment approach is demonstrated by looking at a portfolio of seven building projects managed by the same contractor. The demonstration shows that the allocation of the unused materials helps to avoid waste and reduce costs from over-ordered materials by around 52%. As a result, this also leads to improved coordination between contractors and suppliers and better material flow in construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 3D models; material allocation; project portfolio management; supply chain optimization; transshipment; lateral sharing |
| Index terms: | supply and demand, portfolio management, 3D model, construction material, coordination, construction project, optimization algorithm, supply chain optimization |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, building materials, supply chain optimization, computational design, market analysis, production management, management, algorithms |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Digital Applications, Supply Chain Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here