Chileshe, N; Njau, C W; Kibichii, B K; Macharia, L N and Kavishe, N (2022) Critical success factors for public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure and housing projects in Kenya. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(9), pp. 1606-1617. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Despite the emergence of studies on critical success factors (CSFs) for public-private partnerships (PPPs) implementation within developing countries, there is a paucity of studies that examine CSFs barriers within the context of developing countries, particularly the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) such as Kenya. This paper aims to investigate the perceptions of Kenyan public and private stakeholder’s concerning the CSFs to the implementation of PPPs in infrastructure and housing projects. A quantitative approach using survey-based questionnaire is adopted. CSFs identified from literature review were empirically tested by data collected using a sample survey of 27 Kenyan stakeholders. Response data was subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Results show that “acceptance and support given by the community”, “project feasibility”, “the laws, regulations and guidelines put in place”, “available financial market” and “having a well organised and committed public agency” were the highly ranked CSFs. In contrast, “effective and enough resource allocation and management”, “transparency and equity in the procurement process”, and “proper and efficient training of employees” were the least ranked CSFs. These findings can be used as a road-map for the successful implementation of PPPs, provides insights on the CSFs of PPPs in infrastructure and housing projects across the Kenyan construction sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical success factors; developing countries; housing; infrastructure; Kenya; public-private partnership |
| Index terms: | literature review, Sub-Saharan Africa, survey, housing project, developing country, procurement process, agency, construction sector, critical success factor, emergence, housing, Kenya, questionnaire, regulation, partnership, project feasibility, resource allocation, statistics, implementation, transparency |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, political science, industry analysis, sociology, housing and residential development, partnership management, professional development, development economics, Geography, physical geography and landforms, resource management, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, value management, control systems, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, construction type |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Governance, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Site Management, Urban Studies, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here