Damci, A (2022) Revisiting the concept of natural rhythm of production in line of balance scheduling. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(12), pp. 2335-2344. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The concept of 'natural rhythm of production' assumes that the highest productivity can be achieved as long as an activity is performed in a unit of production by one or multiple crews of optimum size. A scheduler who ignores the concept of 'natural rhythm of production' may perform poorly in developing a reliable schedule, which may in turn negatively affect the performance of a construction project of repetitive nature. This paper argues that considering the concept of 'natural rhythm of production' while establishing a line of balance schedule provides a realistic, continuous, and uninterrupted use of resources. The study demonstrates the existence of negative impacts if the concept of 'natural rhythm of production' is not considered, an area that is mostly ignored in the linear scheduling literature. The research presented in this paper contributes to the body of knowledge by showing that a linkage exists between improving productivity and the concept of 'natural rhythm of production', and makes it easier for researchers to understand what they can gain with the concept of 'natural rhythm of production'.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | line-of-balance; natural rhythm; scheduling |
| Index terms: | line of balance, linkage, body of knowledge, linear scheduling, scheduler, productivity, construction project, scheduling |
| Subjects: | practitioner, management, operations research, knowledge management, production management, business |
| Topics: | Project Management, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Business Strategy, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here