Ebekozien, A; Abdul-Aziz, A R and Jaafar, M (2022) Low-cost housing demand-supply gap: Government housing planners perspective on possible solutions. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(9), pp. 1736-1745. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The Malaysian Governments have made several attempts to make housing accessible and affordable for the low-income earners (LIEs) via various policies and programmes yet the lack of homes is high. Therefore, this paper explores the issues that have enhanced low-cost housing (LCH) demand-supply gap from the government housing planners perspective and proffer possible solutions via qualitative insight. This was achieved through a phenomenology type of qualitative approach that covered eight urban states across Malaysia. The study found that government role in ensuring sufficient supply of LCH has not been significantly demonstrated from pre-development to post-development despite various LCH policies. Among the recommendations is the imposed three acres via cumulative ruling on housing developers, enforcement of computerised open registration for eligibility of applicants, and government to establish a sustainable finance scheme to enhance access to housing-loan for only LIEs. The paper concludes that government should enforce engrave of land title deed such that only LIEs would be eligible to possess LCH while the rent-to-own scheme should be managed by an independent agency, and coordinated via the joint task force. This paper contributes to an understanding that could be provided for policymakers and developers for a better implementation of LCH provision.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demand-supply gap; low-cost housing; low-income earners; Malaysia; planners |
| Index terms: | housing developer, housing, agency, low-cost housing, programme, eligibility, planner, income, land title, phenomenology, implementation, enforcement, Malaysia, qualitative approach |
| Subjects: | sociology, project controls, housing and residential development, research methods, Geography, health safety and environment, methods and analysis, employment law, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, property law, profession, construction type |
| Topics: | Time Control, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Procurement, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here