A new technique for subcontractor selection by adopting choosing by advantages

El-Kholy, A M (2022) A new technique for subcontractor selection by adopting choosing by advantages. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(7), pp. 1171-1193. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Proper selection of subcontractor is considered as an important criterion in the successful management of the various construction projects. Previous methods used for subcontractor selection (SS) suffered several drawbacks such as: its complexity and being time consuming. The main aim of this study is to propose a new technique for SS by adopting Choosing By Advantages (CBA). The selection factors for subcontractor are determined. CBA principals, steps, merits and some of its applications in the construction context are demonstrated. Proposed SS technique is then developed, implemented on a case study and compared with recent methods in literature. The main contributions to the body of knowledge are as follows: (1) propose equations which determine exactly how to assess the percentage advantage for each factor for quantitative factors, qualitative factors with different grades/ranks, and qualitative factors on a yes/no basis and (2) subcontractors attain a positive utility when they are able to combine a low price with a superior level of five factors, which are: reputation, acknowledgement certificates, qualification of staff, amount of work in the last five years, and estimated time of the project. Globally, this technique is highly beneficial to industry practitioners because it will facilitate the subcontractor selection process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: choosing by advantages; construction projects; subcontracting; subcontractor selection factors; subcontractor selection process
Index terms: subcontractor, complexity, qualitative factor, subcontracting, case study, qualification, construction project, body of knowledge, subcontractor selection, practitioner
Subjects: educational resources, practitioner, production management, data analysis and analytics, organization, knowledge management, systems engineering, data collection methods
Topics: Project Management, Supply Chain Management, Engineering Principles, Education, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here