Fung, I W H; Tam, V W Y; Chu, J O C and Le, K N (2022) A stress-strain model for resilience engineering for construction safety and risk management. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(12), pp. 2308-2324. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
'Resilience Engineering (RE)' is a paradigm shift, a discipline, a theory which can be pursuited with a variety of approaches for proactive safety management, which can help the adopted organization better detect where hazards may be released, better cope near the boundary beyond which work is no longer safe, recover if control is lost, and finally to minimize the effects if loss of control is irreversible. The objective of RE is to make 'Resilience' as a system property and apply into a management system. A Stress-Strain Model (SS Model) has been developed based on the 'Four Cornerstones of Resilience', which can be used to characterize and assess the 'Resilience' of the management system by monitoring the relationship of demands or challenge events and the adaptive capacity of the organization to respond. 'Risk Management System (RMS)' is one of the key elements for construction safety. However, facing with the constantly changing site conditions, the existing RMS in fact cannot effectively prevent accidents. This is because the existing RMS is based on the assumption of static situations, some unforeseeable potential hazards which cannot be assessed by the risk assessment might happen later during work processes. To dealing with the dynamic nature of construction site, a dynamic system should be developed. By adopting the SS Model as the prototype, with modification based on the construction scenarios, a conceptual model, a risk SS Model has been developed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; modelling; resilience engineering; risk; safety |
| Index terms: | risk management, paradigm, prototype, management system, safety management, risk assessment, monitoring, construction site, modelling, adaptive capacity, construction safety |
| Subjects: | environmental health, education and knowledge transfer, financial risk, occupational health and safety management, management, work location, analytical methods, control systems, urban design, risk assessment, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Research Practice, Sustainability, Cost Management, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here